From: Rusty
Fleming [mailto:rustyfleming@wavelinx.net]
Sent:
Friday, May 26, 2006 10:33 AM
To:
allison.murray@kleinschmidtUSA.com
Subject:
Allison:
I enjoyed
sitting in on the committee sessions yesterday and getting a feel for the process
and where it is headed. I really wish I had taken more of an interest earlier
when the process was just getting underway, but I was just getting my feet wet
into retirement. After founding The Chronicle and operating it for nearly
seventeen years, I was about maxed out on public meetings. I can see now that
was a mistake.
As we
talked about yesterday, the apathy of the general lake user as opposed to the
commitment of activist like Brady, Lenhart, Starcevitch and McCormick is at best sad. I know I'm a
Johnny-come-lately, but until you tell me otherwise I'm going to provide you
with some thoughts from time-to-time.
There are
many good things which will come from the SMP and quite frankly it's long
overdue. I plan to review the Lake Hamilton plan to get some kind of flavor as
to what to expect. I can only hope the process turns out to be as you described
it... Committees will have input, but the formulation of the actual plan will
be the work of your company with input from GRDA. I also understand the SMP
will have to, in the end, be approved by the full board of the authority.
It was
obvious Wednesday that neither commercial interests, Mike Williams and Bob
Greene, or the Brady Bunch, as I call them, are not particularly pleased. If
they are all displeased you must be doing your job. I know you're a bright
young woman who has probably already figured out the players, but I believe
Brady will not rest until Duck Creek is classified
red and
all future development is shut down. That's why he's so possessed with the boat
capacity study he was clamoring for in the meetings.
When
Oklahoma's Senior U.S. Senator was playing politics with both the Grand Lake users
and the authority in an attempt to get Kevin Easley's job, I wrote a letter to
the editor in support of the GRDA which was published in the Chronicle as well as
several other area publications. Of course, Brady was highly critical of anyone
providing any positive input about the management of Grand Lake. I'm attaching
my response for your review. I would also be happy to provide you with opinion pieces
I have written over the past five years which chronicle the emergence of Brady
and the Duck Creek Property Owners Association.
People need
to make no mistake about it, Mike Brady is a bright guy with some, and I say
some, good as well as constructive ideas. But everyone needs to be alert to the
difference between well thought out ideas and his vendetta again the Marina operators
in Duck Creek. The fact pointed out by Bob Greene with respect to their
absolute lack of interest in habitable structures until one was constructed by
a commercial operator in Duck Creek should absolutely be a red flag.
And finally Allison. The make up of the three committees is going to, in the
end, spell big trouble with the board and Grand Lakers. The fact that as many
as four Duck Creek Property Owners Association members were allowed on all
three committees has the potential to discredit what appears to be a good
process. If as Brady claims, no one else signed up for multiple committee duty,
fine. But when someone as well respected
as John Ballard says his request was rejected while the likes of Brady, Lenhart, Starcevitch and
McCormick were allowed, you can bet the body of their work will be scrutinized.
I'm absolutely certain you and your associates can expect a blood bath
throughout the public comment period.
Just some
thoughts and they're not intended to be offensive, but I think the sleeping
giant is about to be awakened. I'm alarmed enough about the direction of the
process, because of the activists role, that I'm in
the process of forming an alliance of Grand Lakers that I think will in the end
become known as the not so silent majority. In this week's edition of The
Chronicle, I've challenged what I believe is a majority of moderate thinkers on
this lake to join me in the formation of Grand Lakers United Enterprise. If
like me, the majority of us on this lake weren't smart enough to recognize the potential
pitfalls of the development of an SMP in the beginning, we are now.
If you would
like to discuss any, or all, of these thoughts in any more detail, I would
welcome the opportunity.
Cheers from
the Infamous Dripping Springs Cove where I've resided full time since 1981